Challenges concerning multiculturalism in Canada
The official Canadian policy of multiculturalism has been updated twice since its introduction in
1971. It was originally created as a policy based on the logic of ethnicity, modified to deal with racism and
amended to include freedom of religion. In 1988 the Canadian Multiculturalism Act was passed.
Canada is considered a nation of immigrants such that cultural diversity is often presented as the
essence of national identity. However, it is difficult to negotiate social and political policy when trying to
speak for such a varied populace. Two very real challenges that Canada faces in regard to multiculturalism
are the clash of cultures and the socioeconomic position of immigrants.
An example of clash of cultures is the one between English and French-Canada. The province of
Quebec has always asserted a distinct identity and an inclination towards separatism from the rest of the
country. In 1995, there was a referendum in the province of Quebec concerning separation in which 49% of
the voting population voted “yes” and 51% voted “no”. The clash between French and English-Canada is
primarily a cultural clash with Quebec concerned with preserving its own history, language and values;
fearing these things are apt to become lost within English-Canada. Since the referendum, tensions have
cooled a bit and Canada’s national administration has increased their efforts to accommodate Quebec identity
within a Canadian identity.
Another challenge of multiculturalism is the socioeconomic position of immigrants. Diversity is
supported by governmental policy but Canada is still a society where racist interactions and poor-bashing
are severely detrimental to minorities (especially recent arrivals). There are many barriers to equal
integration, especially in education, housing and employment. For example, in the workforce it is very
difficult to get a job when the potential employer feels you are not speaking “proper” English or you do not
have any Canadian work experience on your resumé. This often leads to overqualified people in full-time
minimum wage positions with little or no benefits and no access, time or funds for language classes or other
training programs. These sorts of circumstances lead to isolation, alienation, poverty and unsafe
environments where a new immigrant does not feel safe to report or act against harassment or abuse.
Source: Adapted from http://globalcitizens.pbworks.com/w/page/9036226/Challenges%20Concerning%20Multiculturalism%20in %20Canada.
Mark the CORRECT alternative.
In “The official Canadian policy of multiculturalism has been updated twice”, the verb form indicates something that started in the past and continues in the present.
Comparing the use of verbs in “The province of Quebec has always asserted a distinct identity” and “Since the referendum, tensions have cooled a bit”, we can say that they both talk about something that happened at an unspecified time in the past.
The affixes in the words “ethnicity”, “isolation”, “unsafe” and “harassment” change verbs to nouns.
In the fragments “when trying to speak”, “there was a referendum […] concerning separation”, “education, housing and employment” and “concerned with preserving its own history”, the suffix - ing indicates gerund in all the cases.
In “concerning separation” and “concerned with preserving”, the underlined words have different grammar functions and mean “about” and “interested (in)”, respectively.